Survey: Public Perception of Indonesia's Legal Aspects Remains Poor
Supported By
- A Small Font
- A Medium Font
- A Bigger Font
A majority of Indonesians view Indonesia's legal aspects as poor, according to a survey titled *Political Issue Perception Survey* conducted by the Kurious-Katadata Insight Center (KIC).
39.3% of respondents rated Indonesia's legal aspects as poor, while 16.6% rated them as very poor. In total, 55.9% of respondents believed that the legal aspects in Indonesia are still poor.
Conversely, only 41.9% of respondents stated that Indonesia's legal aspects are good, with 36.6% rating them as good and 5.3% as very good.
The legal aspect received the worst perception among several other aspects, such as political, economic, and security aspects.
In the political aspect, for example, 29.5% of respondents rated this aspect as poor, while 12.1% rated it as very poor. In total, 41.6% of respondents rated the political aspect in Indonesia as poor.
Furthermore, in the economic aspect, 34.5% of respondents considered this aspect to be still poor, comprising 29.5% rating it as poor and 5% as very poor.
The security aspect had the lowest negative perception among the four aspects. A total of 29.5% of respondents considered this aspect poor, consisting of 24.5% rating it as poor and 5% as very poor.
As shown in the graph above, a larger proportion of respondents rated the security aspect in Indonesia as good.
The Kurious-KIC survey involved 580 respondents spread across various regions of Indonesia, with 57.5% male respondents and 42.5% female respondents.
More than half of the respondents were from Java (excluding Jakarta) at 64.3%, followed by Jakarta (15.3%), and Sumatra (10%). The proportion of respondents from Sulawesi, Kalimantan, Bali-Nusa Tenggara, and Maluku-Papua ranged from 0.5% to 3.4%.
Most respondents were aged between 35-44 years (31.8%), followed by the 25-34 year age group (29.5%) and the 45-54 year age group (23.3%).
The survey was conducted from April 27 to May 4, 2023, using the computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI) method, with a margin of error of approximately 3.79% and a 95% confidence level.
"Disclosure: This is an AI-generated translation of the original article. We strive for accuracy, but please note that automated translations may contain errors or slight inconsistencies."
Related Data
Latest Data Stories
Supported By
Trending Topics
Popular Data