Presidential Candidate Debate on Defense, Ganjar Deemed Intelligent

Political

Premium

Adi Ahdiat 08/01/2024 13:24 WIB

URL has been copied

Memuat...

According to research firm Continuum, social media discussions surrounding the January 7, 2024 presidential debate on defense issues frequently portrayed Ganjar Pranowo as intelligent.

Positive Discussion Topics Regarding Ganjar Pranowo on Social Media Following the Presidential Candidate Debate (January 7, 2024)

A Small Font
A Medium Font
A Bigger Font

You are accessing content Single Data Premium.
To continue, please subscribe or buy individually.

Professional

Enjoy premium access with a more affordable price.

Start from

~~Rp300.000~~ 150.000/month

Access more premium content and exclusive features for customers.

Start from

50.000/month

Hanya Rp833 per artikel

More details »

Buy Retail

Read the article immediately “Presidential Candidate Debate on Defense, Ganjar Deemed Intelligent”.

Rp10.000

We accept the following payments:

Some payment methods are still in the process of being activated.

Positive Discussion Topics Regarding Ganjar Pranowo on Social Media Following the Presidential Candidate Debate (January 7, 2024)

Download

Source

A Small Font
A Medium Font
A Bigger Font

The presidential debate focusing on Defense, Security, International Relations, and Geopolitics took place on January 7, 2024.

According to research firm Continuum, presidential candidate number three, Ganjar Pranowo, received a significant amount of positive social media mentions, portraying him as intelligent.

Continuum found that of all positive discussions about Ganjar on social media, the majority (30.85%) focused on "Ganjar's intelligent answers."

Furthermore, 28.07% of discussions involved Ganjar and the keyword "Choose the honest one," and 18.27% related to "Support for a prosperous, advanced, and excellent Indonesia."

Another 13.81% of conversations about Ganjar focused on "His calm and firm delivery," and 8.99% assessed that "Ganjar mastered the debate topics."

Continuum obtained this data from an analysis of 104,323 discussions related to the presidential debate on social media platforms Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok on January 7, 2024.

Continuum claims that the discussions analyzed represent public opinion, excluding opinions from mass media accounts and paid social media influencers (buzzers).

Editor : Adi Ahdiat

"Disclosure: This is an AI-generated translation of the original article. We strive for accuracy, but please note that automated translations may contain errors or slight inconsistencies."