Who is Gatot Nurmantyo's Ideal Running Mate for the 2019 Presidential Election?

Political

Premium

13/07/2018 15:16 WIB

URL has been copied

Memuat...

Retired General Gatot Nurmantyo was one of the figures considered for the presidential and vice-presidential candidacy in the 2019 presidential election.

Gatot Nurmantyo's Electability When Paired with Various Figures in the 2019 Presidential Election

A Small Font
A Medium Font
A Bigger Font

You are accessing content Single Data Premium.
To continue, please subscribe or buy individually.

Professional

Enjoy premium access with a more affordable price.

Start from

~~Rp300.000~~ 150.000/month

Access more premium content and exclusive features for customers.

Start from

50.000/month

Hanya Rp833 per artikel

More details »

Buy Retail

Read the article immediately “Who is Gatot Nurmantyo's Ideal Running Mate for the 2019 Presidential Election?”.

Rp10.000

We accept the following payments:

Some payment methods are still in the process of being activated.

Gatot Nurmantyo's Electability When Paired with Various Figures in the 2019 Presidential Election

Download

Source

A Small Font
A Medium Font
A Bigger Font

Retired General Gatot Nurmantyo is one of the figures in the running for president or vice president. Born in Tegal in 1960, the former Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) commander is a presidential or vice-presidential candidate supported by several parties currently engaged in political lobbying. For information, the registration for presidential and vice-presidential candidates will take place from August 4th to 10th, 2018.

If Gatot runs for president, according to a survey by LSI Denny JA, his strongest vice-presidential running mate is Anies Rasyid Baswedan. The electability of the Gatot-Anies pairing in the 2019 presidential election was 31.8%. This figure surpasses the electability of Gatot paired with Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono (AHY), Ahmad Heryawan, or any other figure.

The LSI Denny JA survey was conducted from June 28th to July 5th, involving 1,200 respondents. Sampling used a multistage random sampling method with a margin of error of +/- 2.9%. Face-to-face interviews with respondents were conducted using questionnaires.

"Disclosure: This is an AI-generated translation of the original article. We strive for accuracy, but please note that automated translations may contain errors or slight inconsistencies."